knumv's
factory1завод элекртонӣ (1),
fee161 euro (1), 2 сомони/сутки (1), 3% (1), no (12), yes (1),
fence_type4Cим сетка (1), barbed_wire (3),
fire_hydrant:type2pond (2),
fixme6201) How does the unclassified road continue? I can't see on the aerial imagery. Or does it continue lower at the river? 2) Drawn after bad aerial imagery (cloudy). Please improve. (1), 10/2013: no hi-res imagery available for south part - please correct (1), 10/2013: no high-res imagery (1), A bit rough outline (2), A path, or even a track? (1), A tertiary or better? Please check. Thanks! (1), Bing shows collapsed bridge - repaired? (1), Can normal cars really drive on this way? On the aerial imagery there seems to be scrub near to or on the road. So, is this the main road (highway=unclassified etc.), or just a track, or ...? (1), Connection just estimated, not visible on aerial imagery (1), Connection not really visible on MapBox imagery. But there must be some connection usable for cars. Please check. Thanks! (1), Connection of road segments just estimated — but there must be some connection here, else the roads would not lead to this point from both sides. Please check. Thanks! (1), Doubtful, nothing to see on the imagery. A channel definitely exists but needs to be re-assessed (1), Estimated connection. Please check ... (1), Estimated part (not visible on MapBox imagery due to clouds). Please map more accurately later (2), Estimated path connection. Improve if possible, (2), Estimated path connection. Is this reasonable? It seems possible to walk here. (3), Ford or bridge or ...? (1), Fragment of a path? Can't see exactly due to clouds on MapBox imagery (7), Fragments of paths? Maybe just used by animals ... (6), How does the unclassified road continue? I can't see on the aerial imagery. Or does it continue upper on the mountain? (2), How does this track continue? It's hard to believe that it ends right here (1), I am not sure about the connection here via the stream. There must be some connection with a ford, but where exactly I can't see from the imagery. (1), I am not sure about this part of the path. There must be some connection between the track coming from north and the path coming from south, but the aerial imagery is bad here. (1), I can't see a bridge. So, is here some ford? Can someone check this somehow? (6), I doubt that this could be a tertiary (1), I have just estimated this connection (I can't see anything on the aerial imagery here). Please please check this and improve/delete the connection, as appropriate. Thanks! (1), I have just estimated this ford, the aerial imagery is rather bad. Please improve position etc. Thank you. (1), Interesting circular structure, probably man-made. What's this? Some kind of water well? Or ... (1), Interesting ditch-like structure. Could this be a (former) track? Please check if you can ... and tag it as appropriate. Thanks! (1), Interesting object in the landscape, looks very man-made. Can somebody identify this? (1), Interesting structure in the landscape, looks very man-made. Can somebody identify this? According to the isohypses in OpenCycleMap, we can interpret this area as almost flat. So, maybe a helicopter landing place, or appropriate for that? (1), Interesting structure in the meadow. IMHO can't be a track/path because it ends abruply on both ends. Please tag if you know what this is. Thank you! (1), Interesting structure in the meadow. If anybody has got any idea what is this, please tag it (and map it better). Thank you! :-) (1), Interesting structure visible on MapBox imagery. Looks man-made. A former track? Can somebody identify this? (2), Interesting, circular strucures visible on MapBox imagery. Definitely looks man-made. A building (a watchtower?), something miltary or some kind of technical stuff? (1), Is here a connection? You would expect one, but can't see it on the aerial imagery. (1), Is here really a bridge? Can't see well on the MapBox aerial imagery. Please check. Thanks! (1), Is here some connection between the 2 tracks? One would expext a track connection, but I can only spot this small line which looks like a path. Hm ... (1), Is it really a building? (2), Is there really a path, or is this just some structure in the rocks? (12), Is there really a path, or is this just some structure on the arete of the mountain? (1), Is there really a path, or is this just some structure on the arete of the mountain? At least it should be possible to walk here, and it looks (partially) like a man-made path (2), Is this (still) a farmyard? (1), Is this part of the path really a path, or just some little stream? (1), Is this really a building? (1), Is this really a farmyard? Could also be, e.g., some military camp :-). Somebody with local knowledge should judge this. Thanks! (7), Is this section of the road a track or a path? (4), Is this way still a usable path or track? Maybe it is abandoned (1), Just an estimated connection (1), Just estimated (clouds on MapBox imagery), improve later when possible. (4), Looks like a building, but please check if possible (2), Looks like a tertiary or better, but seems to end in nowhere (in tracks). Classification is difficult. What do you say? :-) (1), Maybe some building? Or just ...? (1), NB: highway=tertiary or, rather, =secondary, because this highway seems rather important (linking two fertile valleys)? (1), Name? (1), Not clear where this river ends (5), Not really a 'residential' area, but an area of (former?) human activity. Maybe military? Please improve tagging if you know what this is or was (then add prefix abandoned:xxx). Thank you! (1), Not sure about this part, probably they just drive via the farmland here (1), Or just highway=track, if this road does not connect to further settlements etc. (1), Partial cloud cover on Bing imagery (3), Path connection rather estimated — please check (2), Path or (partially) track? (26), Path or track? (9), Path or track? I thought it was just a path, nlachance changed it to track. What do you say? (1), Path or track? Looks rather narrow ... (1), Path or track? On the aerial imagery it's not clear. (1), Path, track, or eventually just some stream? (1), Probably shouldn't be located in the riverbed (1), Rather estimated connection. Please check if possible (1), Rather estimated way via the grassland. (1), Rather estimated. There must be some connection between the very good track section in the north (going down to the river) and the highway=unclassified. I guess they drive here: many traces on the ground?!? (1), Really a building, or just some temporary structure? Hard to say from the aerial imagery ... (5), Really a building, or something else? Hard to say from the aerial imagery ... but definitely man-made. (1), Really a path, or (partially) just a stream and partially some linear structure in the rocks? (1), Really a path, or (partially) just a stream? (1), Really a path, or just some linear structure of the rocks? Hard to say for foreigners ... (1), Really a regular path? If yes, please continue along the valley (1), Really a regular path? Seem strange at this place, but looks too narrow for a track. (1), Really a track? Looks narrow. But what else can it be? A footway or cycleway would be strange here on the farmland ... (1), Really a track? Or some kind of ditch? (1), Really a track? The line seems too narrow ... but one would exect a track here, because it connects tracks. (1), Really buildings? It's hard to see, but it's near to a road (2), Road or Fence??? (1), The aerial imagery is not clear, but there must be some connection here. Please map more exactly if/when possible. Thanks! (1), The limits of the residential area have been cut along the edges of the Bing imagery. Possibly needs to correct extent. (1), The place name has been taken from the GEOnet Names Server (which is suitable for OSM use, see our OSM wiki!). But the name can be outdated. So please check the name if you have good, reliable, and legally suitable sources. Thanks! (3), The place name(s) have been taken from the GEOnet Names Server (which is suitable for OSM use, see our OSM wiki!). But the name(s) can be outdated. So please check the name(s) if you have good, reliable, and legally suitable sources. Thanks! (21), This area was tagged as landuse=farm. Now landuse=farm is not only obsolete, but also clearly does not apply here (anymore) — this area is neither farmyard nor farmland. Please tag this area appropriately if you can identify its usage/type. Thanks! (2), This area was tagged as landuse=farm. Now landuse=farm is not only obsolete, but also clearly does not apply here — this area is neither farmyard nor farmland. Please tagg this area appropriately if you can identify its usage/type. Thanks! (1), This part of the river/stream can just be estimated from the current MapBox imagery. Maybe the water flows (partially) underground here. Please check/improve when better sources are available. Thanks! (1), This part of the track is rather estimated. If you can improve, please do so. (1), This part was guessed, because not covered by the imagery in Bing (1), This section of the river is just estimated (MapBox aerial imagery too bad). Please improve if better sources are available. (2), This structure is here to slow down current and reduce disaster impact. What are the correct key and value? (1), Traced from a winter image. The exact extent of the riverbank needs to be checked (5), Track or (partially) just a path? (5), Track or (partially) path? (6), Track or just path? (3), Track or path? (2), Track or path? Seems too narrow for a track, but ... (6), Transition just estimated, please check and improve (2), Trees/bushes seem to be planted in a rectangular pattern here, so this is man-made. Some kind of plantation, or just planned forest? (1), Trees/bushes seem to be planted in rows along the hill (isohypses), so this is man-made. Some kind of plantation, or just planned forest? (1), Type of crossing? Level_crossing or ...? (4), Very approximate course (1), Very strange road, not visible on MapBox imagery. Either this road is new, or it is mapped very inexactly. (1), We should refine this residential outline later (1), What is this object on the MapBox imagery? I can't see a shadow, therefore I hesitate to tag it as building. But what is it? (1), What's this? (2), Which one of the two parallel highways is the main (unclassified) one: the one near to the river or the remote one? If you know, please tag the main highway as highway=unclassified and the other one as hw=track or =service. Thanks! (3), Which variant of the road is the main (unclassified) one, the northern or the southern? If you know, please change tags. Thank you! (1), Which variant of the road is the main (unclassified) one, the upper (eastern) or the lower (western) one? If you know, please change tags. Thank you! (1), Which variant of the road is the main (unclassified) one, the upper or the lower? If you know, please change tags. Thank you! (3), Which variant of the road is the main one, i.e. the normally used one? If you know, change the tags if necessary: make the less important variant highway=service or so and the more important highway=unclassified or better. Thanks! (4), Work-in-progress (2), a bit rough outline (1), add missing towers! (8), c (1), contine (1), continue (157), continue (below) (1), continue? (7), disused? (2), http://minjust.uz/ru/interactive/registries/registry/tashreg/ говорит что ЗАГС на 80 квартале, а территория помечена как 81 (1), http://minjust.uz/ru/interactive/registries/registry/tashreg/ говорит что ЗАГС на 80 квартале, а территория помечена по другому (2), landuse unknown (1), make relation (5), man-made (1), name (5), need GPS tracks to complete the path (1), need GPs track ot new imageniry (1), not clear on the imagery where the path is going. GPS tracks needed (1), not sure (67), only partial (1), opening_hours (1), resurvey (7), rough outline (1), survey (15), survey exact position (2), to be continued (28), track unclear on the aerial picture (1), work-in-progress (2), Похоже на кладбище (2), бозор = ҷалҷам (1), был hamlet снесли (1), вроде кладбище (1), какойто шпиль? (1), может и не водокачка (2), мост или труба? (1), на снимке проктически нечего не видно из за облаков, все прорисовываю реки и горы по высотам (1), надо уточнить название (1), не знаю можноли по этой дороге пересечь границу (1), не уверен esr:user (1), не уверен за СУВОНОБОД и ЕСР (1), незнаю что это такое. (1), похоже на кладбище (12), похоже на кладбищн (1), скорее не башня но судя по тени чт-то высокое (1), тут чтото не так, врятли улица Узакова так разворачивается (1), уточнить religion= (2),
flag5http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/Flag_of_Uzbekistan.svg (1), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9a/Flag_of_Afghanistan.svg (1), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Flag_of_Kyrgyzstan.svg (1), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Flag_of_Tajikistan.svg (1), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Flag_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China.svg (1),
food1yes (1),
foot989designated (2), no (37), permissive (1), yes (945), yну (4),
footway73crossing (33), sidewalk (40),
ford491stream (3), yes (488),
frequency14550 (145),
fuel:biodiesel1yes (1),
fuel:cng5yes (5),
fuel:diesel15no (1), yes (14),
fuel:lpg5no (1), yes (4),
fuel:octane_1001yes (1),
fuel:octane_8014yes (14),
fuel:octane_9111yes (11),
fuel:octane_9210yes (10),
fuel:octane_958yes (8),
fuel:octane_985no (1), yes (4),
fuzzy3500 (3),
другие | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | r | s | t | u | v | w | y | z |