| k | num | v's |
| 1 | 1 | 10 (1), |
| 2tag | 9 | Baby diaper changing table (2), Mototaxi (1), Office supplies (2), Shop = bed mattress (1), Training center (1), diaper changing table (1), photo_studio (1), |
| 4wd | 11 | yes (11), |
| 4wd_only | 4162 | barn (1), grade4 (7), no (3), recommended (780), yes (3371), |
| FIXME | 181 | Approximate location based on GeoNames database. Please verify! (1), Both names are possible. Which one is correct? (1), I don't know how to continue this ditch (1), I found no proof that this hamlet is called El Chilamate and the OpenTopo map calls it Las Brenas. (1), I think this is the wrong name. (2), I'm not sure about the name of this village. According to OpenTopo, Los Limones seems to be the area, but there is also a small settle ment called Santa Isabel just on this place. Thanks for helping. (2), I'm not sure about this name, it's possible that it's "Palam" or "Palan". Please verify. (2), Known settlement of decent size. (1), Known village. (1), Location approximate. Adjust location with no knowledge, when highres imagery available or survey. (81), Location estimated from website description (1), OpenTopo map 3156i Puerto Viejo is wrong. The segement is going into Cano Walwaska, not Quebrada El Abra. Check sat imagery for verification (3), Please review with better sat imagery. (1), The route of Caño Uhumbila on the OpenTopo maps 3358ii and 3357i doesn't really match the topographic settings. It looks like there is another stream in the Southern part.Please review and correct where necessary. (1), The topo map shows 4 nearby village names, none is centered exactly here. (1), This might not even connect. .. Check. (1), This restaurant doesn't seem to be in the exactly right place (looking at the imagery) .. Someone who knows this place: Could you verify the location, please? (and then remove this tag) (1), USGS GNS considers Hendy Creek as part of Hanna Creek, but not confirmed by Opentopo map 3452iii Bluefields. Also the OpenTopo map mentions Caño Anna and not Caño Hanna (1), Very cloudy sat imagery (Maxar, Bing and ESRI). Please verify and adjust when better sat imagery available. Thanks! (9), Very cloudy sat imagery. Please improve if better imagery available. (1), Very cloudy sat imagery. Please verify and adjust. (1), What would be appropriate tag? (1), What's the name of this village. I found nothing. (2), Where is this bridge? (1), boundaries of the residential area are a bit approximate (1), boundary is an approximation based on driving by (1), check rd class on ground (1), check rd class. Doesn't show clearly enough in Bing to classify better - but cetainly not unclassified. (1), check the shop class (1), check where this begins and ends. Name was marked at intersection w/ Av. Universitaria (4), correct tag for this? (1), does this piece of road actually exist? Imagery would imply that there's a canal/drain which the road would not cross.. (1), exact location (and floor, other details) unknown (1), exact location to be adjusted (1), geometry is inaccurate due to cloudy Bing (1), improve geometry & verify rd class (when better imagery accessible - with a better connection) (5), is there a connection between these? (1), is there a gate here or just an entrance? .. (Didn't mark this in my survey notes..) (1), is this a comm tower or what - nothing? (3), location approximate due to Bing clouds. get GPS trace (1), location approximate, remember that it's in this block (when drove by) (1), location slightly approximate (1), name? from? to? (2), no wind turbine on bing and mapbox images but a building (1), rd continues (1), rough estimate from driving on the ground. Need to adjust route/geometry with GPS trace (once it's been uploaded) (1), sketched from developer's description (2), survey detailed path of stream; Bing partially covered by vegetation (1), survey detailed perimeters (1), survey detailed road/track classification (only noted as track in North end, estimated from Bing) (1), survey details (2), survey exact geometry (1), survey exact route/path/geometry of the trail (5), survey further (2), survey if this connects - it would seem so per logic (and not impossible per imagery = tree cover) (1), survey if this is a road/path and what class + where it actually runs. (1), the boundaries of this should be drawn but that needs survey as the imagery is fully covered with clouds (1), the position of this is not very good (per the anon map note..) (2), this doesn't seem to be in the right place... Ask around where La Pepesca is exactly... (1), this highway is probably in a much better shape than it looks on Maxar sat imagery as published 2022. on the Western side is newer sat imagery and it looks much better. Please check and thank you! (1), this is a guesstimate based on survey (because of clouds in Bing) (1), this should be surveyed to map it well as there is too much tree coverage (1), trace further (1), track continues (1), verify existence (1), verify if this is actually a road or not (.. seems like so in Bing) (1), verify. Information based on description by someone who supposedly knows the name and location (2), what is the area? Fenced? Walled? Structure (building=?)? Other? (1), |
| GNS:id | 70 | -1110140 (1), -1110213 (2), -1112188 (1), -1112528 (1), -1113564 (1), -1114753 (1), -1115116 (1), -1115329 (1), 3615635 (1), 3615706 (1), 3615717 (1), 3615729 (1), 3615730 (1), 3615759 (1), 3615923 (4), 3615924 (1), 3615928 (1), 3615944 (1), 3616153 (1), 3616155 (1), 3616187 (1), 3616283 (1), 3616323 (1), 3616607 (1), 3617083 (1), 3617084 (1), 3617138 (3), 3618019 (1), 3618031 (3), 3618762 (3), 3618764 (1), 3618787 (1), 3618810 (1), 3618824 (1), 3618830 (1), 3618847 (1), 3618848 (1), 3618857 (1), 3618872 (1), 3618979 (1), 3619000 (1), 3619045 (1), 3619137 (1), 3620157 (1), 3620200 (1), 3620205 (1), 3620414 (2), 3620592 (1), 3620642 (1), 3620649 (1), 3620697 (1), 3620699 (1), 3620700 (1), 3620735 (1), 3620772 (1), 3620898 (2), 3620923 (1), 6942325 (1), |
| ISO3166-1 | 11 | AQ (1), CA (1), CN (1), CR (1), FR (2), HN (1), NI (1), SV (1), UM (1), US (1), |
| ISO3166-1:alpha2 | 11 | AQ (1), CA (1), CN (1), CR (1), FR (1), HN (1), NI (2), SV (1), UM (1), US (1), |
| ISO3166-1:alpha3 | 11 | ATA (1), CAN (1), CHN (1), CRI (1), FRA (2), HND (1), NIC (1), SLV (1), UMI (1), USA (1), |
| ISO3166-1:numeric | 10 | 010 (1), 124 (1), 156 (1), 188 (1), 222 (1), 250 (2), 340 (1), 558 (1), 840 (1), |
| ISO3166-2 | 29 | CR-A (1), CR-G (1), CR-H (1), CR-L (1), HN-CH (1), HN-EP (1), HN-GD (1), HN-OL (1), HN-VA (1), NI-AN (1), NI-AS (1), NI-BO (1), NI-CA (1), NI-CI (1), NI-CO (1), NI-ES (1), NI-GR (1), NI-JI (1), NI-LE (1), NI-MD (1), NI-MN (2), NI-MS (1), NI-MT (1), NI-NS (1), NI-RI (1), NI-SJ (1), US-AK (1), US-UM (1), |
| San | 1 | Andrés (1), |
| TMC:cid_58:tabcd_1:Class | 2 | Area (2), |
| TMC:cid_58:tabcd_1:LCLversion | 2 | 8.00 (2), |
| TMC:cid_58:tabcd_1:LocationCode | 2 | 2 (2), |
| V4 | 1 | La melonera (1), |
| WDPA_ID:ref | 1 | 34671 (1), |