knumv's
facebook28https://www.facebook.com/A-Lill-Haff-Famill-Peller-388383018265137/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/Amed-KEBAB-2069711363085624/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/BrasserieBeaulieu/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/Capricci1/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/CarReprise.lu/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/Cistulu/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/De-klenge-Randschelter-Bistrot-MiRo-1590097241249871/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/Haff-A-Sewen-831334850375929/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/LUNEXUniversity/?ref=hl (1), https://www.facebook.com/PNLFNEL/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/Pharmacie-de-Belval-111215757173037/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/Restaurant-Pizzeria-Wine-Bar-Il-Cavaliere-1244243102451599/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/Salon-Cla-1163823433725101/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/auchan.lu (1), https://www.facebook.com/beastbeautyshop/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/biohaffclees/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/bnluxembourg (1), https://www.facebook.com/boulangerieluxpascal/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/elise.mosca.osteo (1), https://www.facebook.com/faretramamer/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/gullivertower/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/Agricultural-Cooperative/Holstein-Bosseler-Limpach-176317672867517/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/pizzeriascheffleng (1), https://www.facebook.com/pommecannellelu/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/umisaqisushi/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/vianettoyage.lu/ (1), https://www.facebook.com/weareluxfine (1), https://www.facebook.com/wltt.lu (1),
faces21 (1), Post (1),
fallen1trunk (1),
farm2bio (2),
farmyard4dairy (1), paddock (1), poultry (2),
fast_food2cafeteria (2),
fax228+ 352 24 55 82 29 (1), +32 2 712 17 05 (1), +33 (0)9 72 14 52 97 (1), +35 2 26 31 34 03 (1), +352 - 26 95 77 99 (1), +352 - 76 90 64 (1), +352 20 20 23 79 (1), +352 22 02 30 (1), +352 225566 (1), +352 23 620 764 (1), +352 24 55 87 39 (1), +352 24 55 95 54 (1), +352 2446 9599 (1), +352 2448 3299 (1), +352 2448 7599 (1), +352 2448 9299 (1), +352 2449 1299 (1), +352 2449 2299 (1), +352 2450 748710 (1), +352 247-75351 (1), +352 26 10 60-29 (1), +352 26 17 62 38 (1), +352 26 19 04 51-1 (1), +352 26 19 68 66 (1), +352 26 27 66 630 (1), +352 26 32 22 07 (1), +352 26 34 78 34 (1), +352 26 341 341 (1), +352 26 35 28 87 (1), +352 26 36 64 50 (1), +352 26 38 92 94 (1), +352 26 39 32 53 (1), +352 26 40 39 39 (1), +352 26 48 53 - 89 (1), +352 26 499 699 (1), +352 26 50 22 82 (1), +352 26 50 25 56 (1), +352 26 50 41 41 (2), +352 26 50 50 35 0 (1), +352 26 50 76 - 20 (1), +352 26 50 79 24 (1), +352 26 51 14 81 (1), +352 26 51 58 50 (1), +352 26 52 18 61 (1), +352 26 58 00 97 (1), +352 26 58 01 51 (1), +352 26 58 05 73 (1), +352 26 58 06 57 (1), +352 26 58 07 11 (1), +352 26 58 08 92 (1), +352 26 58 10 60 (1), +352 26 58 13 53 48 (1), +352 26 58 16 76 (1), +352 26 58 18 05 (1), +352 26 58 19 57 (1), +352 26 58 22 54 (1), +352 26 58 24 64 (1), +352 26 58 24 77 (1), +352 26 58 27 21 (1), +352 26 58 27 50 (1), +352 26 58 28 63 (1), +352 26 58 29 62 (1), +352 26 58 29 84 (1), +352 26 58 30 85 41 (1), +352 26 58 33 69 (1), +352 26 58 35 18 (1), +352 26 58 38 63 (1), +352 26 58 46-46 (1), +352 26 58 47 - 47 (1), +352 26 58 49 22 (1), +352 26 58 52 75 (2), +352 26 58 62-21 (1), +352 26 58 66 628 (1), +352 26 59 00 52 (1), +352 26 59 15 58 (1), +352 26 59 95 99 (1), +352 26 62 10 91 (1), +352 26 68 46 41 (1), +352 26 71 45 54 (1), +352 26 72 08 47 (1), +352 26 74 32 44 (1), +352 26 74 70 05 (1), +352 26 81 01 71 (1), +352 26 81 43 30 (1), +352 26 8888 28 (1), +352 26 91 42 27 (1), +352 262766730 (1), +352 26340068-23 (1), +352 26478045 (1), +352 2658 2237 (1), +352 26748-299 (1), +352 2687 6438 (1), +352 2691 7074 (1), +352 26958112 (1), +352 27 12 66 89 (1), +352 27 28 15 52 (1), +352 27 58 56 01 (1), +352 27 58 56 15 (1), +352 27 58 59 59 (1), +352 27 76 16 77 (1), +352 27 800 904 (1), +352 27 99 85 43 (1), +352 273 950 46 (1), +352 275 885 (1), +352 276 963-290 (1), +352 311991 (1), +352 33 37 18 (1), +352 34 93 63-35 (1), +352 34 93 92 (1), +352 341134-22 (1), +352 341467 (1), +352 39 71 77 (1), +352 40 21 21 4070 (1), +352 40 21 21 4170 (1), +352 40 21 21 4270 (1), +352 40 21 21 4370 (1), +352 40 21 21 4570 (1), +352 40 29 28 (1), +352 40 30 50 (1), +352 40 34 33 (1), +352 44 99 70 20 (1), +352 45 28 38 (1), +352 46 14 01 (1), +352 467667 (1), +352 48 82 88-306 (1), +352 49 61 73 (1), +352 4997 9599 (1), +352 50 28 78 50 (1), +352 51 50 07 60 (1), +352 51 85 68 (1), +352 51 9452 (1), +352 52 37 50 29 (1), +352 55 44 05-55 (1), +352 57 49 49 (1), +352 58 00 10 (1), +352 58 00 63 (1), +352 58 00 94 (1), +352 58 05 30 (1), +352 58 24 20 (1), +352 58 24 50 (1), +352 58 25 53 (1), +352 58 29 40 (1), +352 58 35 33 (1), +352 58 35 61 (1), +352 58 36 10 (1), +352 58 36 61 (1), +352 58 36 63 (1), +352 58 37 11 (1), +352 58 37 26 (1), +352 58 37 36 (1), +352 58 37 60 (1), +352 58 38 91 (1), +352 58 40 60 (1), +352 58 42 30 (1), +352 58 44 06 (1), +352 58 44 79 40 (1), +352 58 45 69 (1), +352 58 45 71 (1), +352 58 48 60 (2), +352 58 49 35 (1), +352 58 54 81 (1), +352 58 54 94 (1), +352 58 55 76 (1), +352 58 62 39 (1), +352 58 64 20 (1), +352 58 68 34 (1), +352 58 69 47 (1), +352 58 72 55 (1), +352 58 74 07 (1), +352 58 77 1-1210 (1), +352 58 77 11 929 (1), +352 58 80 04 - 55 (1), +352 58 81 11 (1), +352 58 81 73 (1), +352 58 82 25 (1), +352 58 85 10 (1), +352 58 86 56 (1), +352 58 92 22 (1), +352 5820-2722 (1), +352 59 03 11 500 (1), +352 59 24 36 (1), +352 59 46 62 (1), +352 59 56 10 (1), +352 72 41 73 (1), +352 72 81 44 (1), +352 72 87 56 (1), +352 735 155 (1), +352 74 04 64 30 (1), +352 749539 (1), +352 760645 (1), +352 78 03 80 (1), +352 78 88 94 (1), +352 787110 (1), +352 789668 (1), +352 79 9151 (1), +352 799327 (2), +352 80 2786 (1), +352 81 09 72 (1), +352 87 96 78 (1), +352 89 9093 (1), +352 899 117 (1), +352 8991 42 (1), +352 90 0615 (2), +352 92 94 51 (1), +352 93 70 35 (1), +352 97 80 78 (1), +352 99 35 53 (1), +352-2650-2820 (1), +352-43-6095 (1), +352-54-69-74 (1), +35226784045 (1), +352403016 (1), +352590548 (1), +49 65 25 9315 5 (1), +49 6526 1330 (2), +49 6550 9291858 (1), +49 6584 7066 (1), +49 6584 9140-40 (1), +49 6866 1005 (1), 26590123 (1), fence (1), hedge (1),
federation1FLF (1),
fee1661 no (1), 0.70€ (1), 1€;2€ (1), Lu-Ve 8:00-12:00 & 14:00-18:00 (1), MON-FRI (1), Mo-Fr 08:00-12:00, 14:00-18:00; PH off (3), Mo-Sa 08:00-18:00 (1), interval (2), no (1203), none (1), yes (445), €0.70 (1),
fee:conditional4no @ (stay < 3 hours) (1), no @ (stay < 4 hours) (1), yes @ (stay > 1 hours) (2),
female23no (1), yes (22),
fence2yes (2),
fence_type2460barbed_wire (51), bars (7), chain (14), chain_link (94), electric (4), hedge (1), metal (32), metal_bars (5), needleleaved (1), pole (5), railing (60), wall (2), wire (2031), wire_fence (3), wire_mesh (80), wirew (1), wood (69),
fenced14protecting (1), yes (13),
ferry3tertiary (1), yes (2),
fire_hydrant:count12 (1),
fire_hydrant:couplings32B (3),
fire_hydrant:diameter203100 (78), 110 (1), 120 (2), 150 (48), 170 (1), 200 (21), 250 (2), 50 (6), 70 (1), 80 (36), 90 (6), N/A (1),
fire_hydrant:position779grass (1), green (103), lane (103), parking_lot (14), sidewalk (441), street (116), underground (1),
fire_hydrant:type2192pillar (917), underground (1270), wall (5),
fireplace37no (35), yes (2),
fishing5customers (1), no (1), permit (2), private (1),
fitness_station11box (1), fitness_station (1), horizontal_ladder (1), rings (1), sign (4), yes (3),
fix4resurvey (2018 storms) (1), survey (3),
fixed38Both gates are locked so no access (1), Looks more like a storage area for rubble and sand (1), Name? (2), Needs verification on place. (1), Re-survey name, does the sign say "Abbé"? (1), Should this not be maxspeed=30? actually it is 50. (1), Should this not rather be highway=service or highway=track with access=destination or something like that? (2), True length is supposed to be 92m. 1954 map shows ~75m. (1), appears in frequent use again but now a path (1), construction completed (1), inspected it 04Oct16 (3), is this no a straight line? > no, see Lidar (2), new_name; was Etappe (1), resurvey if it sill continue (1), resurveyed 26DEC21 (1), resurveyed 26dec21 (1), same as from Rte de Lux to bridge (1), survey, was previously plotted from Geoportail.lu Topo but mistaken (1), there are no foot/cycle signs, except sign Langefeld (1), this is a G2 track upto turning circle surveyed03MAR21 (1), this is no longer a signif. path (1), this is not private; cfmd 23FEB19 (1), this is start of relation 9351270 (1), this path at edge of field and in summer maybe trail_vis interm. (1), this path exists and trail_vis good (1), this runs edge of forest but is getting overgrown (2), this was modified and is no longer cycleway 2018 (1), track exists and stops at railway; there is a gate to go accross (1), tunnel starts at end of new Paribas building (2), walked it (1), yes but routed differently from topo (1),
fixme2827"climbing:grade:uiaa:max=?" + "climbing:grade:uiaa:min=?" (1), 10110 (1), 11011 (1), 138 or 137? (1), 2 diff. house nbr or one the same (to be merged)? (2), 20 or 22? (1), 3 Lellgerwee is on An de Bëssen? (2), ? (2), ?? (1), A priori reclassé en N56 : https://travaux.public.lu/fr/publications/cartes/reseau-routier-avec-pk.html (2), A priori reclassé en N56A : https://travaux.public.lu/fr/publications/cartes/reseau-routier-avec-pk.html (1), Abat Jour (1), Access and maxspeed, and living_street? (1), Access is prohibited "en cas d'enneigement ou de verglas". Not sure how to encode that. (1), Access restrictions? (3), Access? (3), Actually they sell accessories for mobile phones (1), Address makes no sense; survey (1), Address? Website uses Place Guillaume, CACLR and house number say 20 Saint-Antoine. (1), Addresses wrong in caclr, survey (1), Adjust perimeter Ortho21. (1), Adjust position one ortho is available. Check whether there are bollards at the north end. (1), Adress & Location (5), Align to imagery after 2017 pictures become available (1), Alscheid (2), Ancien poste d'aiguillage ? Si oui, bâtiment préservé. (1), Any name for this cycling route along the Sauer river? (1), Are bikes allowed? (1), Aufteilung des ways und genaueren Verlauf, vor allem im Saarland (2), Based on a single noisy GPS file and my memory and notes. Mostly invisible in aeral imaginery. Still needs some refinement. (2), Bastogne, Place Merceny; Marvie, rue de Wiltz (1), Binsfeld, Beim Musée (2), Bitte Verlauf kontrollieren (2), Black MTB tour passes over here (2), Buergplaz oder Knëppchen? (1), Building shape is approximative. Needs to be updated when it is on the aeral imagineray (1), Building this is attached to? (1), Built between 2013-2016. Does luxring connect here? (3), Bâtiment démoli selon les vues aériennes. (1), Bâtiment vraisemblablement dans la bande de 20 m nécessaire pour élargir la rue, et donc à démolir : https://www.wort.lu/fr/luxembourg/avec-le-tram-jusqu-a-bonnevoie-620fd87ede135b92365c3fad (1), CACLR has "5-.." as buggy housenumber. Investigate if there's really nothing else. (1), CACLR has 2 but 2A was on osm. Check house number. (1), Cadastre and street sign names differ (2), Cant read the name on building! Dosy? (1), Capacity from memory, please check (1), Cars allowed? (1), Ce poste est-il toujours en service ? (1), Ce tronçon existe-t-il réellement ? (1), Check PC31a itinerary (4), Check Tudor Tour cycling route near this intersection (1), Check crossing on 2022 imagery (5), Check depth shop (1), Check house number (4), Check house number - is it part of 9? (1), Check house number, 3 in use but makes no sense (1), Check house numbers (3), Check house numbers - is everything 7? (1), Check house numbers - is there no 12A? (1), Check if 'Ministère de la Sécurité sociale' is located here (1), Check if 26 exists? (1), Check if 32 and 34 are separate or 32-24 should be one node (2), Check if 42 and 44 are separate or 42-44 should be one node (1), Check if 57, 59 or both (1), Check if 7 exists on south side (1), Check if 7A really exists on the ground (1), Check if oneway for bicycle (1), Check if the line goes there, and what that thing is (1), Check if this exists and if it is accessible for cars (1), Check if this house number really exists on the ground. Please add a comment to my changeset. (2), Check if this is part of Hunkemoller (1), Check if this is really 199A (1), Check if this is still paved with cobblestone:flattened (2), Check name (2), Check name on sign (5), Check name on sign - Knapp or Um Knapp? (1), Check name:lb (3), Check on 2022 imagery (2), Check on 2022 imagery if drawn (1), Check on 2022 imagery if still present (8), Check on the ground where Piscine ends and Chiers begins (1), Check oneway, barriers, access (1), Check position after road rebuild (1), Check red marking on 2022 imagery (3), Check street name on sign (1), Check type of highway and whether it really exists (35), Check what building 2B belongs to (1), Check what street sign says? (1), Check where is this door from the outside (1), Clean up geometry (1), Comes from parking (1), Connection pending to new bridge ? (1), Connection to dernier sol? (1), Continue (4), Continue South (1), Continue cycling itinerary (via Gernsback?) (1), Continue with aerial images post 2019, see cutdown forest. (1), Could not find path that was suggested by outdoor app. Please survey the ways before adding them from areal photographies (or at least please do not make routing possible through them, it ruins outdoors experience) (1), Could you turn left on exit? (1), Couldn't see 2016-10-23, still there? (1), Create the island (3), Creos marker? (2), Currently the gas station is being transformed. It is not yet clear whether it will reopen or not. (1), Dead-ended oneway street? (3), Derenbach, Beim Wämperwee; Wincrange, Ecole (2), Does the hotel still exit? There is a facebook page, but I could not find it on https://all.accor.com (1), Does the house number say 12 or 12A? (1), Does this POI exist? (1), Does this connection exist? (1), Does this end here or join the line west? (1), Does this exist? (1), Does this platsic bridge still exitsts? (1), Does this really exist? (1), Does this still exist? (6), Double check house number (6), Double check house number: 48 or 48A? (1), Double check house number: 7 or 5A? (1), Double check house number: 7 or 9? (1), Double check house number: 8/9 or 9/9A? (1), Double check speed (5), Double-check house number (1), Double-check house numbers on upper levels (1), Double-check house numbers when construction done (2023?) (2), Doublecheck if it is the right building (1), Doublecheck location (2), Doublecheck maxspeed (13), Draw in naturel reserve perimeter (1), Drawn from local survey while construction was ongoing. Update when new data is available. (1), Due du fossé or niddeschgaass? (1), Démolition prévue (1), Emplacement exact. (1), Espèce à déterminer (Q. robur ou Q. petraea) (1), Est-ce moi ou selon les services de type street view il n'y a aucun panneau rue piétonne ? (1), Est-ce un bassin de rétention des eaux de pluie ? (1), Exact location (6), Exact location; what is this? (1), Exact location? (18), Exact position of the boutique? (1), Exact position, names? (1), Exact position? (1), Exact route to be examined (2), Exact shape? (1), Extend (1), Fermeture à la circulation pour 8 mois à partir du 4 avril 2022 : https://www.wort.lu/fr/luxembourg/rangwee-ferme-pour-huit-mois-a-partir-du-4-avril-621dee0ede135b9236e998e0 (3), Fermé définitivement. (2), Firehydrant or sewer? (1), Footpath, Track... ? (1), Former school? Seems Reuler replaced it. (1), Funktion, Bezeichnung (7), Gebäude dimensionieren (1), Gebäude richtig dimensionieren (1), Geht der Nimstal-Radweg bis Trier? (1), Geometry east half from lidar, check if passable (1), Haltestellen in Kersch und Olk, Kirche fehlen (1), Haltestellen in Kersch und Wintersdorf, Im Sauertal fehlen (1), Haltestellen unvollständig (1), Haltestellen unvollständig; Verlauf in Prüm (1), Here Flashdance? (1), House number is missing in CACLR. Presumably it's 1, and the other 1 on top of the hill is maybe something else? (1), House number there? (2), House number? (3), Housenumber is based on logical sequence only. Verify once construction has finished. (1), How about foot access? (3), How to tag this? (1), How to tag? (1), I couldn't find it - does it exist? (1), I read this name on a sign near the northerly entrance of the Raiberhiel, not sure if it is correct here (1), Imprecise especially north of Canach, interpolated from pipeline markers when no trace on imagery in any year (1), Improve spatial accuracy (1), Improve: invisible on aerial imagery due to bridge (1), Interpolated from pipeline markers when no trace on imagery in any year (1), Is address number 16? (1), Is fixme node 1626381149 related to this? (1), Is it really the shop name? (1), Is it really the street name? (2), Is street name sign in Luxembourgish? (1), Is street sign "Op Schneckelsbierg"? (1), Is the autopedestre Tuntange really following this route? I saw the blue pointer on way 230347156 (1), Is the name Alscherstrooss or Alschterstrooss? (1), Is there a median here that would make the restriction redundant if it were mapped? (1), Is there a turn restriction from the N3 to turn left on CR156? (1), Is this Rue André Losch, and the other street Op der Mauer? (1), Is this a building entrance? (1), Is this a deadend, does the path continue, or does it end up at the street? (1), Is this a deadend? (1), Is this another (modified) concrete shelter quickly built after the WW2 bombings, like the one in Kehmen? (1), Is this building still inhabited/ruins? (1), Is this building still under construction? It has been marked as such about a year ago so construction should be finished by now? (1), Is this connected to Sellergronn? (1), Is this oneway, or highway=service? (1), Is this oneway? (2), Is this part already access=destination? (1), Is this really a CR road? (1), Is this really gardened during normal conditions? There was only grass this winter 2021 (1), Is this still a waymarked route? (1), Is this still exist ? (1), Is this still here ? (1), Is this the real name? (1), Is thsi way really shared with 4w vehicles? So why not a service road then since it is well maintained? Sign AB3 is maybe there only for cyclists? (1), Isn't this now mainly a theatre? Theatre: Le 10 ? (1), Isn't this shop longer? (1), Isnt parking:lane:left=diagonal a better tag? (1), Jean-Baptiste or Jean Baptiste? (1), Junction with Avenue de la Liberté near Place des Martyrs (1), Jusqu'au prolongement de la ligne, cette voie ne sert pas en service commercial normal. (1), Kikuoka blue passes here (1), Kindergarden building? (1), L 31 : Sarreguemines - Sarrebruck (1), La production doit s'arrêter d'ici 2021. (1), La signalétique semble indiquer que c'est bien un sens unique ouvert aux voitures. (1), Lage des Flusses nur grob (5), Le 09/08/22, l'extrémité sud-est était asphaltée. Vérifier jusqu'ou. (1), Le Rangwee étant fermé, vérifier le sens de circulation. (2), Length of shop? (1), Length shop? (1), Les sources sont très contradictoires concernant la classification de la N4 et du CR169 dans cette localité. (2), Lidar show straighter track, Heatmap shows people curving (1), Long term roadworks - review Q1 2015 (1), Longer? (2), Longlaville;Longwy;Herserange;Saulnes (2), Manque des commune a l'est (1), Maxspeed? (7), Maxspeed? / check bicycle access (2), Maxspeed? Still in construction on 2021 imagery. (1), May become a shared cycle/footway, please check in the future (1), Middle section could use confimation. (1), Missing shop? (1), Mont-Saint-Martin;Longwy;Mexy;Saint Charles (2), Move to exact position (1), Move to exact traffic light line position with 2022 imagerpy (1), N37 exists in law, but not reference document from P&CH. Report bug? (4), Name Arelerstrooss or Dickerecherstrooss? Survey street signs at roundabout. (3), Name guessed from communal council 13 July 2016 http://bissen.lu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Klautjen-2017-1.pdf (2), Name guessed from garnich.lu, check on the ground (1), Name on street sign? (1), Name, maxspeed? Survey needed. (1), Name? (7), Name? Not indicated on outside. (1), Name? Topo has Fréngerhaff but Frëngerhaff until 1989, CACLR has Frengerhaff (1), Needs Details + Fix the ways inside the area as there is a building there as far as I know but I'm not 100% sure (1), Needs check on terrain, if paths are connected north. (1), Needs confirmation from survey on terrain. (1), Needs confirmation if only hole or water body. (1), Needs confirmation on terrain. (1), Needs survey to check connection. (2), Needs to be be checked with lidar map. (1), Needs veryfied connection to road network (1), No house number? (1), Non-free source? (1), Non-free source? What does that mean ? (11), Not P&T? (1), Not in geoportail.lu, does it exist? (1), Not sure if this is really the name of the shop (1), Not sure where rue du campus ends (1), Nouveau tracé de la rivière ? (1), Objet à déterminer (1), On site: Add access data. Just added the road from aerial view (1), Open Street Map ne le plaçait pas au bon endroit sur la carte. (1), Open for all traffic? (2), P&R Metzange (2), Part of BIL? (1), Part of this road: no access for cyclists? Which part? (1), Path or track? (1), Paths north here? (1), Perhaps highway=service? (1), Pipeline marker or street sign? (3), Pipeline marker? (3), Piste d'éducation à la circulation routière... exploitée par qu ? (1), Platform on other side for 622 Wiltz -> Rambrouch? (1), Position 49°47'27.37" N 6°18'13.85" E (1), Position approximative (3), Position from http://www.rail.lu/pontlignesauertalsauer.html, where was this exactly? (3), Position in building vs. other police station? (2), Position is probably wrong, as this place has significantly changed (2), Position shops correctly (1), Possibly longer (1), Possibly under parking (1), Private or public? (1), Private property? Seee cadastre. (1), Radwegregelung (1), Re-survey after construction (2), Recheck names using CACLR once available (6), Regular resurvey after landslide. Might open again, might not. (1), Remove/resurvey after construction done (1), Resurvey (1), Resurvey house numbers (1), School building as well? (1), See if there is a 18A/18B there (1), See where zone 30 ends exactly (2), Sehr gefährlich praktisch unpassierbar, teilweise weggeschwemmt (1), Sehr ungenau (1), Sens unique temporaire pour 8 mois à partir du 4 avril 2022 : https://www.wort.lu/fr/luxembourg/rangwee-ferme-pour-huit-mois-a-partir-du-4-avril-621dee0ede135b9236e998e0 (1), Serait-ce le CR 191B ? (1), Shape? (4), Should it be renamed as "Libération 1944"? (1), Should this not rather be highway=service or highway=track with access=destination or something like that? (1), Shouldn't extend over city boundary (1), Site en cours de déblaiement fin 2020 : https://www.wort.lu/fr/luxembourg/la-future-skyline-des-rout-lens-se-devoile-5fae5e18de135b9236498443 (1), Site ravagé par un incendie semble-t-il, état actuel à surveiller. (1), Some (underground) parts in Dudelange are missing (1), Some kind of cycle barrier? (1), Some of the "tracks" branching off from this path actually looked like paths as well. There might be more of those in the area. (3), Source for name and limits of wood? (1), Source of the river Gander exact loc unk (1), Speed limit and access? (1), Spelling; what is this? (2), Spelling? (1), Split for addresses (3), Still existing? (1), Still passable? Looks overgrown. (1), Strange path with a very high step to the kerb; verify if still exists in Q2-2022 (1), Survey - is this 66 rue Émile Mark instead? (1), Survey after construction done. (14), Survey correct position? (1), Survey exact location (14), Survey exact position (3), Survey exact way, invisible on lidar (2), Survey house number (4), Survey housenumber, it's missing from the official database. (1), Survey needed, new bypass changed things (1), Survey, check if still usable. (2), Survey, get a gps trace (2), Survey, still exists? (2), Survey, very approximate based on old maps (3), Survey: is this rue de la banlieue? (1), Tag as foyer scolaire? (1), Technically, cycling is allowed coming from the park, because there is no restriction sign for bicycles coming from that direction. (3), The official data set describes these remarkable trees as a "tree row", without specifying the boundaries. A resurvey would be useful to figure out where the tree row starts and ends (1), There are two number 6 in the street?! (2), There's something under this tree, hidden from satellite view, but I can't remember what. (1), This building is possibly a bit longer (1), This is a house! (1), This is not a living_street? (1), This is not on geoportail.lu imagery, does it exist? (2), To verify (1), Traced from lidar and winter imagery, survey (3), Traced from lidar, check on ground (1), Tracé approximatif basé sur le cadastre. (3), Tracé exact à vérifier. (1), Traffic lights? Tactile paving? (1), True length is 172m (1), Two ways going into the park? (1), Type of shop? Where is this exactly? (1), Underground position only assumed (2), Unpassierbar umgestürzte Bäume (3), Used to be house number 77. Deducted construction because house number disappeared from CACLR. (1), Verify house number (1), Verify maxspeed: at least part of this road is maxspeed=30 (1), Verify name (1), Verify species, identification may be inaccurate (1), Verify status as nature reserve: there are no visible local indications designating it as such, nor is it listed as part of the nature reserve which includes part of the "ënneschte Bësch" to the east and south on geoportail.lu. (1), Verify street name (1), Verify street name, update once ortho is available (2), Verify that this is indeed part of Centre Convict and not part of the hotel (3), Verify what segments are part of"backbone" of the cycling route (2), Verlauf der nördlichen Einmündung in die Strecke ungenau (1), Visible on lidar and cadastre, check if passable (1), Visible on lidar, but usable on the ground? (4), Visible on lidar, walkable in real life? (1), Vorsignal fehlt vermutlich noch (1), W side starts as a track, what about the other end? (1), Was this site part of excaptions? Is this still valid? (1), What is here on level 1? (1), What is here on level 1? Loterie Nationale? (1), What is here? (16), What is in here? (1), What is in the old school? (1), What is the exact location of this place? (1), What is this POI? (1), What is this exactly? (1), What is this route? (1), What is this? (16), What is this? City wall? (1), What is this? Correct name? (1), What is this? Does it still exist? (1), What is this? Not sure if it is a building. (1), What is this? Spelling? (1), What kind of shop? (1), What platform ref is this? (1), What type of way is this? (1), What's the right house number? (2), When does the zone 30 stop in the west? (2), Where does it come from, where does it go? Where does it come from, power line Joe? (1), Where does the canal connect, to Alzette or Mierbech? (1), Where does this lead to? (1), Where exactly? (1), Where is this supposed to be?? (1), Which buildings exactly? (4), Which warehouse? (1), Wincrange, Béigener Strooss;Wincrange, Centre Médical (2), Wirklich nur Pizza hut drin? (1), You can turn left here now, coming from the junction from Erpeldange village (not contournement)? Turning right joins the N7 direction North. (1), a railway made of grass? (2), access (39), access private? (3), access/barrier missing? (1), access: are construction works done? (1), access=goods (1), access? (24), according local observation, this way is now closed the area being protected, what about the "Red Rock Ellergrond" route? (2), according terrain this is wrongly positioned (1), actual name unknown (1), add name (1), add name etc. (1), add name/reference (1), add shops (1), add specific "communication" tags, specially "microwave" since it's in a recreation area. (1), additional signals (speed etc.) missing (2), address (1), address;phone;additionel information (1), address? (1), adjust exact position (2), adjust once ortho is available (1), aeroway hangar? (1), allotments? (2), also accessible to agricultural vehicles? (2), approximative position; check during Q3-2021 if works are done (1), are the inner loops part of the route? (1), bad GPS signal during survey: resurvey exact location (1), barrier? (1), bicycle access (1), bicycle/foot on this road allowed? (3), bicycle? (3), boundary does not seem right, example: node 2803984730 should be at coordinates: 49.8720733, 5.7539593 according lux. map and physical boundary stone (1), bridge is being rebuilt; verify status in December 2021: works expectations until 17.12.2021 - 18h00. (1), bridge? (1), building destroyed? see changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65724077 (1), building type? (1), can't remember if this was an adit or simply a building built in the rocks (1), capacity (1), car still there according aerial photos, other littering? (1), cette ligne sera à découper en deux parties : L 01A et L 01B (1), check Ortho21 for clearcut dimensions (1), check access (6), check access (C,2 sign?) (2), check access (the other way on the south side of the farm indicated a private way) (1), check access: currently access=no but part of some hiking routes (1), check addr:housenumber (1), check bicycle access (50), check bicycle access: mandatory mixed footway and cycleway sign from Val de Hamm (1), check capacity: really 3? (1), check car and bike access (1), check during Q3-2021 if works are done (3), check end of mandatory mixed cycleway+footway on Val de Hamm (1), check exact position (5), check foot access (3), check highway type and if it has a name (1), check if PC 17 really goes through this way; seems a bit dangerous... (1), check if a section is oneway (1), check if construction works are done in Q2-2022 (2), check if it's not a power station rather than a sub station (1), check if living_street (as maxspeed=20) (1), check if not a path (1), check if not grade 1 type track (2), check if open to motorised traffic (1), check if still exists (11), check if there are stairs on the way (1), check if this is a footway where cycling is allowed or a combined foot-cycle way (1), check if this is a permanent or a just a temporary memory path (1), check if this way is going to be a foot access or a road (1), check location (1), check maxweight (2), check name (houses nearby are on rue du Bois) (1), check name in the future (2), check on ground (1), check oneway as there's a give way sign near house number 26 (1), check position (11), check position/alignment (1), check reference (1), check street name (2), check surface: sand + grade1 are literally incompatible (1), check the limit of 50 zone on the North side on the way (1), check this way (5), check track grade on the entire way, from the intersection in the middle of the forest it is a grade2 track (3), check track properties (surface, grade and smoothness) (1), check tracktype (1), check tracktype: looks like a grade2 compacted gravel track but did not survey it (1), check traffic restrictions (current access looks spurious) (2), check type of containers (1), check verify path onsite (1), check where number 7a is: maybe part of this building (1), check where oneway starts/end (1), check whether the bridge has been fixed yet or not (1), chek if cycleway (1), closed due to works around the stadium, to check in Q1/2021 (1), commercial or office? (1), condition of track to be verified (1), confirm (3), confirm campus (1), confirm speeds, lanes (1), confirm still exists (1), confirm/correct landuse (2), confused with bicycle_rental? (1), connect to the way network (1), connection? (1), consider deleting: I could not find the north-eastern end of this during a local survey in September (1), continue (104), continue ; resurvey - could not find the links in Bertrange city centre (1), continue W or NW (1), continue as path? (1), continue in France (1), continue or delete? (1), continue or spreads? (1), continue or spring? (1), continue to S or NW? (1), continue track grade5 or does it go undeground (there is a spring near Siweburen)? (1), continue with a path? (1), continue with building passage + access? (1), continue, but probaly goes nowhere (2), continue/noexit? (1), continue; hiking route signposted on this way (1), continue? (106), continue? looks rather like a temporary track for forestry exploitation (1), continue? possibly i confused this with the path 10m on E (1), continue? possibly i confused this with the path 10m on W (3), continues (37), continues E & W (1), continues in straight line and should connect with track (as per old map) (1), continues through the forest SE direction (1), contues but path blocked by fallen trees (1), correct entire buildings overlapping (2), could not find this way, disappeared? (2), couldn't find this track; hidden by grass or gone? (1), cycling really prohibited there? (1), dead? its biggest branches are cut (1), decayed on the North side, but don't know to what extend (1), did not find name. (1), didn't pay attention where it starts exactly, before or after the cavern. (1), didn't see this track on site; does it exist? (1), different resources show continuous non private ways (1), direction (2), direction? (2), disappearing way, tagged for deletion after review (4), do a site survey to find if track still exists (2), do not see this stop (1), do the routes really pass here? (2), does PC VDL2 really pass on the other side of tram and then back? (3), does it connect to the track? (1), does it flow also to this direction? (1), does it really exist? (3), does it still exist? (4), does it still exist? I don't remember having to go through a gate (1), does this connect with R Duc Adolphe ? (1), does this link with any other path? (1), does this old path still fully exist? (1), does this path end here? (1), does this path end here? does it connect to the main road? (1), does this route still exist (some ways haven't been maintained & renaturalized like 118807131, 118807139)? (1), does this still exist? (Apr2019) (1), doesn't it continue on the primary road up to the existing bridge where there is another virtual way suggesting evidence on terrain via LIDAR? (1), doesn't it flow down the field? (1), doesn't this way still connect anymore to the next southern way? (1), dog park? (1), double check name, guessed from cadastre and cadastral localities (1), drinking water? (1), duplicated house number (2), either via Rue de Romains or down hill following unnatural terrain form on LIDAR? (1), embankment wrong (6), exact fee, municipality website was unclear (1), exact location (1), exact location or ruins? (1), exact location? (2), exact perimeter (2), exact perimeter with aerial photos (2), exact position (5), exact position tbc due spiking gps (1), exact position? (8), exact step_count (2), exact updated route to survey on terrain (1), farmyard? (1), feature tag (1), fee (1), fee? (1), fence isn't accurate enough, crossing highways (1), fence? (1), finish route (1), fire_hydrant:diameter (1), fix correct corner of street crossing (1), fix start, end & gaps (1), fixme (1), flagged for removal: forestry track is disappearing (1), flagged for removal: please verify before deleting (1), flagged for removal:forestry track is disappearing (1), foot=designated or yes? bicycle=designated or yes? (2), frontières incomplètes (1), gaurd rail on a pedestrian area? (1), general access still no? (1), geometry not correct (1), geoportail: Hausnummer vertosch? (2), grade2/smoothness does not reflect on Lidar (1), grade3? (2), guessed on base of spots seen on satellite images and logic (1), guide post had fallen, so i sticked it up back but i did not have the routes to check (1), height (2), hgv=destination only from Western side? (1), highway type (2), highway type correct? (1), highway type was removed. Re-put old setting; please verify way. (1), historic city wall? (2), historic ruins? It doesn't look like that (1), house reconstructed recently, needs new house number (8), how are these poles connected? (1), how is this connected? (1), i doubt this is a tertiary, i recall this road being forbidden to motor vehicles & the barrier is still in OSM (3), i guess that these stepping stones having been installed because the natural area is often wet, so: wetland + full "ford=stepping_stones" on this way? (2), identify road name change spot (3), if kept, cycling routes relations should be updated (1), if this building:part is the entire building it is useless (transfer tags to main building and delete) otherwise plot only the concerned area (1), in active construction? otherwise this should be tagged as grass since some time may pass before building constructions start (1), incline (1), incline is wrong (1), incline, not sure anymore, up according topography (1), includes apartments too? (1), incomplete (2), information ??? (1), interpolated (2), invisible path, flagged for removal (after verification) (5), invisible way, flagged for removal (after verification, please) (1), is cycling on this way really prohibited? (1), is it accessible? I see some gates on the areal photographies (2), is it still closed? (3), is that way open to general traffic? (1), is this a footway? (1), is this a living street? (1), is this an embassy or a consulate, ambassador’s residence…? (1), is this cycle way separate or a lane? (1), is this no a straight line? (1), is this part now of the camping? (2), is this path now private? (1), is this path redundant to the track next to it? (1), is this private? (2), is this really a track or a road? (2), is this road really named? (2), is this still official? (1), isn't the sidewalk shared with biccyle since it's a PC? (2), isn't this a water drain? (1), isn't this too narrow for bicycles? (1), landuse (4), length and shape shop? (1), length shop? (3), level (1), link to nearby footway; I did not pay attention at where the entrance is located. (1), living_street... really? (1), location (5), location is approximate (2), location unsure, GPS behaving erratically, remove fixme if you get the same location (1), location:defibrillator (1), looks paved on the areal photography (1), lots of forest paths and tracks to map (1), lying down (1), mapped as a separate way where it's only a lane (1), marked as MTB route relation but I didn't find the marking onsite (1), marked as access=no because of fallen trees on the way; to verify if abandoned or now. (1), maxspeed changed to 30? (6), maxspeed? (12), maxspeed? @wet was defined higher than maxspeed (4), maxspeed? LuxRadar 13 has maxspeed=70 (1), maxspeed? Red light on the way out? (1), may be changed (1), merge equal/duplicated relations (1), missing in the 04/01/2022 dataset, seems to exist (1), multiple restriction from and to Differdange (request to make a relation and then delete this fixme) (1), name (7), name ? (1), name missing (3), name was Boschebierg, did not find sign. (1), name,operator (1), name,operator,wires (18), name: isn't it RUE HEDEKNIPPCHEN? (2), name: signs shows Kitschenerwe in uppercase without the accent, please someone check (1), name; add. details; max_speed, etc (1), name? (26), name? Is this the clinic chapel? (1), need check if road name is correct (1), need survey arround Rue de la Tour Malakoff Amay (1), needs further plotting (1), needs precise location, treet in the middle of the track is likely incorrect (2), needs refining (2), needs survey confirmation (1), needs survey, lidar looks negative (1), never seen such an access (1), new line will be connected to existent line (2), no trace of continuation but why the bridge? (1), nodes disconnected from straight lines, reuse elsewhere (1), noexit or continues? (1), not entirely broadleaved/deciduous hence wrong (1), not found (1), not sure about the bench position (1), not the actual course, please plot as a route relation on the ways. (1), not the usual fixme, rather fix your comprehension: after 8 years people still don't get the difference btw path/track! (1), one way? (3), oneway:bicycle=no like 25469880? (1), opening hours (1), opening_hours (5), operator, collection_times (1), operator? (2), or drinking_water? (1), or gate+access? (1), or shingle? (1), orchard? (4), outdated, use for new elements (3), part of historic citywalls? (1), part of the city walls/fortification? (1), parts are steps so set wheelchair to no until steps mapped (1), passes south of garages: shift south by appr. 4m (1), path continues (1), path from memory, not surveyed! (1), path not clearly marked Does it really exist (1), path now? (1), path or track? (1), path? (2), pipeline marker? (1), pipeline service building? (1), platform? (1), please add precision in location (1), please add precision of location and continue (17), please check alignment / lost in vegeatation no? (1), please check if the conditional expression is correct (sign says access restricted to local traffic in case of snow or ice) (2), please check name (1), please continue (6), pls confirm alignment (2), position (7), position based on hillshade and memory only (1), position estimated (4), position estimated on photos in www.moien.lu (1), position not accurate (4), position on way (1), position à corriger (1), position, formely far from path (1), position, this can't be in the middle of the river (1), position, this was in the middle of rocks (1), possibly a path to connecting both tracks? (1), possibly broken (1), possibly converted to farmland or meadow like another portion confirmed (1), possibly grade2 check back in normal conditions (2), possibly tr2 but surveyed in frozen winter, resurvey in normal conditions (1), possibly will extent as fallen trunks were still on the ground (1), precision (6), precision & overlapping (1), public building, need to check what's in there in addition to a school (1), put in right place in the building, and correct tagging (6), quarry? (1), rather a weir (1), rather path? (1), razed and new building? (1), reactivate elsewhere (1), reactivate if present after constructions (1), real name, personality name (1), really one way? no sign when coming with a bike (1), really underground from the top? there seems a side ditch (1), recent tracktype changes (1), recent way changes? tracktype2? (3), recheck in 2021-Q4 (1), reduce number of nodes, outer rings have a limit of 2000 nodes (1), removed? (1), renaturalisation of the drain in stream, please erase this area when constructions are over (1), resurey (1), resurey, nothing found on Lidar Winter 2018/2019 (1), resurvey (394), resurvey & complete (1), resurvey & continue (3), resurvey (there is no GPS heatmap) (1), resurvey access (1), resurvey access, previously gate, now fence and other obstacles blocking behind (1), resurvey access, private doesn't seem right as I see many GPS activities (1), resurvey access, seems being closed (5), resurvey after construction works (3), resurvey after constructions are over (1), resurvey all access (1), resurvey as it was diverted with the nearby construction works (1), resurvey because of fallen trees (1), resurvey bicycle designation (1), resurvey depth (1), resurvey depth, light is needed (1), resurvey earth_bank or cliff (2), resurvey easiest path since floods 2021.07 (5), resurvey either here or is it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9705010925 (1), resurvey end intersections (1), resurvey exact location of futzeeck (3), resurvey grade: track is vanishing in the West part (1), resurvey if steps (1), resurvey in Q2-2022 (1), resurvey lanes (1), resurvey link (1), resurvey more accuratly (1), resurvey more specific feature (1), resurvey northern side, southern side exists (1), resurvey once finished (8), resurvey position (7), resurvey position and if there is a trail (1), resurvey railway value (1), resurvey sicne way is clsoed now (1), resurvey since forestry work (1), resurvey tracktype, from road by car it seemed degraded (1), resurvey tracktype, it's not a grade1, at the crossway in the forest i had noticed it's a grade2 (3), resurvey type of way (12), resurvey type of way & local signs, some access must be allowed to reach the facilities: parking, picnic table, pedestrian way (3), resurvey western end (1), resurvey where the mud starts on N side (1), resurvey without snow (1), resurvey, Heatmap is different from Geoportail.lu topo (1), resurvey, Lidar shows the streams starts way upper (1), resurvey, acces from rue des romains blocked by barbed wire (1), resurvey, continue? (4), resurvey, fallen trees across the path, very difficult to walk (1), resurvey, finished? (3), resurvey, i think i saw a way from the eastern end (1), resurvey, internet source for MTB route seems passing here (1), resurvey, is this along the path or the track? (1), resurvey, is this still here? Is there an underground hydrant nearby as well? (1), resurvey, it was open to public, there are benches... (3), resurvey, long time didn't use (1), resurvey, looked large enough to be a track (grade3) (1), resurvey, may be outdated (1), resurvey, no GPS Heatmap (1), resurvey, no heatmap (3), resurvey, nothing on Lidar, nor GPS Heatmp (1), resurvey, position might be off a bit (1), resurvey, possibly a path now or overgrown (2), resurvey, possibly becoming overgrown (2), resurvey, possibly growing forest (1), resurvey, recent new tracks around (1), resurvey, see changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93706243 (2), resurvey, seems passing through a private property/not existing (1), resurvey, seems reattributed (1), resurvey, seems still being heath in 2022 after 3 years (1), resurvey, several other gates from barriers against swine flu have been removed (2), resurvey, steps not correctly located before this edit (4), resurvey, there are constructions (4), resurvey, was part of 857231848 (1), resurvey: I could not find this in July 2019 (1), resurvey: can this actually count as a track? Does it lead anywere? (1), resurvey: check accuracy and other properties (lit, width, ...) (5), resurvey: may no longer exist (1), resurvey: may no longer exist. I could not see the north end in July 2019. (1), resurvey: probably removed in 2021/2022 as construction in Rue des Chênes expanded west (1), resurvey: street makeover is done (1), resurvey: there are more stairs somewhere here (1), resurvey; resurveyed 04AUG2023; totally overgrown (1), resurvey;might be a ditch (1), resuvey (2), reuse elsewhere (2), reuse when reconstructed (1), review maxspeed, road reference and bus routes (8), review maxspeed, road reference and bus routes Maxspeed correct (1), review/revisit in Q1/2022 (1), review/revisit in Q4/2021 (1), revisit as the south part was in a field which is no longer the case in Oct 2020 (1), right access, is it also confused with the close // way ? (1), right landuse? (1), roman road? (3), roman villa somehere in this field (1), route changed, to survey (2), route déplacée sur son nouveau tracé ? (2), route_node = start (1), ruins with valuable historic or just ruins? (1), seems abandoned but didn't get evidence (1), seems gone. Please verify if it's not a mistake before deletion (2), seems to be removed or completely mud covered, please verify on site: areal photographies do not match ground pictures (1), set highway type (residential, unclassified?) (1), shape and position are approximative (1), shelter? (1), shore position (2), someone could check if there's another gate at the other end (1), something is going on there: check if a new road is being built. (1), source imagery, to verify (1), source of name? (1), source? no construction here but only a field (1), south end blocked on purpose by large tree trunks (1), southerly end certainly has no sign of it (1), southern end not found during local survey. Overgrown? (1), species: willow? (1), species? (1), specific access and correct highway accordingly if needed (possible this is only for pedestrians and bicycles) (2), split underground/overground buildings (1), stairs go in a zigzag way. just look at geoportail to fix (2), stairs seem to go over or through the building as at this point all infrastructure is undergroud/has grass roof. so cut the building in 2? (1), stepcount, can't remember if it was for these only or also included those previously on S (1), stepping stones? I can't recall a bridge here (1), steps count without steps, steps or not? (1), steps here assumed from bad tagging, please check (1), steps? (2), still a parking? (1), still active? (2), still closed du to floods? (1), still existing? (1), still inaccessible? (1), still part of residential street? (zone 30 ends at the North intersection) (1), stream continues? (1), street name? (4), streettype, access (2), suppression programmée voire déjà effective (maj au 8/06/2020) : http://kayl.lu/543-avis-au-public-passage-a-niveau-de-la-ligne-ferroviere-noertzange-rumelange (1), surface (1), surface vs tracktype (1), surface was wrong (1), surface, not grass? (1), surface/grade: doesn't seem to be asphalt to me (south part was a gravel track) (1), surface=dirt? (1), surface=fine_gravel according previous edit ? (2), surface≠tracktype (1), survey (142), survey E side (1), survey access (2), survey access? (1), survey exact location (4), survey exact position (5), survey exact position and capacity (1), survey house number (2), survey if landuse changed (1), survey if still exists (1), survey if still exists? (1), survey me! (2), survey name (1), survey name, is this Rue Georges Schwartz? (3), survey once completed (1), survey orinally a roman road (1), survey overgrown? (2), survey start/end of track/path in East (2), survey steps position (1), survey the exact position once construction is finished (1), survey to see if it needs to be removed (1), survey tracktype (7), survey type of way, possibly an alley, motor vehicles on Geoportail.lu 2019 imagery (2), survey type ofhighway since (1), survey what is this exactly (1), survey(old) (1), survey, confirmation (6), survey, continue, tracktype (1), survey, how much overgrown? (1), survey, might be torn down already (2), survey, might not be there anymore (1), survey, old (8), survey, ontinue? (1), survey, overgrown as well? (1), survey, overgrown? (7), survey, partly overgrown already? (1), survey, possibly waterway=drain or highway=path (1), survey, stairs seem too long (1), survey, steps? (1), survey, still exists? (2), survey, still usable? (2), survey/private? if yes delete (1), switch W304? (1), switch W306? (1), tag needs to be redefined; part of garden display (1), temporary - remove once construction is complete (1), tempted to put grade2, if you like me please edit (1), the funny sign is gone;recheck (1), the way (was a track) goes over some sort of large ditch, possibly rather a waterway=ditch feature, there is one also connecting the stream (2), there are 2 lifts, each going to another direction (1), there are strict times for access of this pseudo parking (1), there is a path beyond (1), there seems to be a fence now, does the path still cross on the fence/farmland? (3), there was a horse=designated, resurvey horse access (1), these ways needs to be detailed with dedicated lanes to include the parking entrances/exits and edit accordingly the relation routes (3), this area seems organized for trees, resurvey (1), this is now a pavement with no clear access rights to residential road (1), this is officially classified as brushwood and is in bad state of maintenance (1), this leads to an emergency exit ofnthe building. so I set it to access=private (1), this looks like a dead end but is part of a 2012 walk (1), this node is not really relevant, better create a relation hiking route which will include all ways (1), this route does not correspond with official online route (1), this route is blocked on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2709758528/ (1), this seems awfully unusual through private property (2), this seems specials, water seems now going under a holed surface, survey on terrain (1), this should continue as per geoportail (1), this was connected to the road, location? (1), this way was completely imprecise, relations might be wrong too (2), to be completed (2), to be corrected and completed (1), to be split/detailed (1), to be updated after constructions (3), to be updated with new features (35), to be updated; a railway made of grass? (1), to complete (2), to extend (1), to merge or edit with relevant tag when finished (1), to place elsewhere (1), to update (1), to update when back to normal (1), to verify: tracktype grade1 conflicts with unpaved surface (3), to_verify (1), tomolobla (AKA Capslock_Cleaner) ceated this hole, since woodpeck praises his edits, I'm leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (AKA Capslock_Cleaner) tagged this area as gate, since woodpeck praises his edits, I'm leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner added this as vineyard whereas it is obviously a forest, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner created this as forest whereas it's a mix of different natural features, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner created this as forest whereas it's scrub, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner created this awkward building with shelter key, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner created this hole, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (13), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner created this island without any MP integration, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner created this portion as grade5 whereas its surface is fine gravel, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner created this tree which never existed, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner deformed/overlapped this way, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner desintegrated a MP in fragments the 10.02.2021 without carring to integrate back the inners 766617248 & 766617250 (i corrected this one, revert this changeset to see) created before (26.01.2020) (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner desintegrated these areas from MP in CS 98356994 and overlapped them with the forest, I've repaired the overlapping but since woodpeck praises his edits, i created this fixme for proof (4), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner desintegrated this area from MP in CS 98369891 and overlapped it with another are, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner didn't properly integrate with MP as it was before, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner overlapped this conflicting area, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner plotted this as tree_row whereas it's not in row and are several trees misaligned rather ina rea, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (4), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner plotted this barrier the opposite direction, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner plotted this with the wrong side, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner plotted this with wrong direction of flow, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner plotted this without precision, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner removed the MP structure, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner removed this portion of forest and made it overlapping with scrub, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) AKA Capslock_Cleaner tagged this as forest whereas it's a clearcut+scrub, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) added this as forest whereas in 2019 it was already rather scrub and has inaccurate position, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (3), tomolobla (user_3961358) added this as forest whereas it rather scrub and has inaccurate position, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) added this as forest whereas it rather seems an orchad, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) added this as forest whereas it rather seems residential (building, swimming pool...), since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) added this as meadow whereas it rather seems an orchad, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) added this as overlapping forest with opposite leaf_type, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) added this as tree_row whereas it rather is a scrub/wood, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (2), tomolobla (user_3961358) created this hole, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) edited this forest as broadleaved whereas it has also needleaved trees, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) mistagged this as historic=bridge, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), tomolobla (user_3961358) set this way as private whereas it is a named street and common to multiple residentials, since woodpeck praises his edits, i'm just leaving this here as proof (1), track continues (1), track has been claimed back by nature, flagged to removal (1), track or cycleway? there are several entrances to fields, possibly traffic signs are outdated (1), track or path? (1), track4? (1), track? (4), track? definitly single trail surrounded by short grass & thorny scrub (may be cut though if maintenance for larger passage), surface seemed compacted (1), tracktype (2), tracktype vs surface (1), tracé exact (1), tree cut, to move elsewhere (1), tried to follow this way and it's impossible to find (1), turn restrictions (1), type of landuse/building? (1), unable to find it, tagged for removal (1), underground? (1), unpassierbar durch umgestürzte Bäume (1), unpassierbar umgestürzte Bäume (2), unsure of the legal status of this trail (natural reserve), to survey yet (3), update E3, has changed and newly signed (1), update area with more precision (1), update perimeter once im sat available (1), update this element if building or basin after constructions (1), update when over (2), update which side is used now (1), use this element freely on a new feature (1), verify (5), verify access and way type (1), verify access; gate on the East side and the other gates do not show on areal photographies (1), verify accurate position (1), verify bicycle access: part of cycling route but bicycle=no (1), verify exact position (2), verify if "Désirée" or "Désiré" (1), verify if it is a removable bollard here (1), verify if path links the two tracks (1), verify if private way (1), verify if really a private way - my GPS geotagged photo was a bit off the route (1), verify if still exists (not claimed by vegetation) (2), verify if this is part of the living street area (1), verify if this part of the street is also a living_street (1), verify if this path exists; could not find it during survey (1), verify if this way is a path as it doesn't seem wide enough to be a track (1), verify if this way still exists in 2022 (1), verify if track still exists (1), verify if way continues as there's a nature reserve sign in the area allowing pedestrians in (1), verify name (name sign missing) (2), verify position (1), verify route details at railroad bridge Walferdange (1), verify start date (1), verify street and postcode: Romains or Chemin de fer? (1), verify track and access (1), verify track grade (1), verify vehicle access (C,2 sign?) (1), verify; no trace of use on strava (1), weight balance for trucks? (1), westbound traffic light for bikes? (1), western side blocked and is rather a path (4), what are these mounts? (1), what is here? (2), what is this? (4), what kind of feature exactly? (1), what kind? (2), what's that name? (1), what's this exactly? (3), what's this? (4), where does Basbellain end? (1), where does Biwisch end? (2), where does it continue? (1), where is this lavoir? (1), where? (1), why a ford with no water way? mistake or water not mapped? (1), why is there no label for a climbing wall or did I just not see it? Please let me know how to create one if you know how to. (1), wide enough for wheelchair? (1), wouldn't this be the spring from La Chier ? (2), yes (22),
fixme:CACLR3found 0 rows for 23 An Erzelt at 49.6065986 6.0467373 (1), found 0 rows for 24 An Erzelt at 49.6066569 6.0474175 (1), found 0 rows for 3 Routscheed at 49.6518922 6.2448768 (1),
fixme:sharcrash1special note on perimeter to fix/discuss (1),
fixme:survey73According to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1936630, the bench is rotten and cannot be used. (1), Apparently this tree was removed? (1), Concatenated names in original data set! Data: Acer,Tilia,Fraxinus (3), Concatenated names in original data set! Data: Acer,Tilia,Fraxinus. The official data set describes these remarkable trees as a "tree row", without specifying the boundaries. A resurvey would be useful to figure out where the tree row starts and ends (1), Concatenated names in original data set! Data: Aesculus hippocastanum,Tilia. Identifying boundaries could also be useful. (1), Concatenated names in original data set! Data: Tilia,Acer,Platanus. The official data set describes these remarkable trees as a "tree row", without specifying the boundaries. A resurvey would be useful to figure out where the tree row starts and endss (1), Concatenated names in original data set! Data: Tilia,Betula,Fraxinus,Acer,Populus. Identifying boundaries could also be useful. (1), Concatenated names in original data set! Data: Tilia,Fraxinus. The official data set describes these remarkable trees as a "tree row", without specifying the boundaries. A resurvey would be useful to figure out where the tree row starts and ends (2), Concatenated names in original data set! Data: Tilia,Populus,Malus,Fraxinus (1), Exact location? (7), Exact position? (3), Extact location (3), Is this still active? (1), Move to exact position. (2), Multiple trees of a given taxonomy. Data:5 Sorbus domestica. The official data set describes these remarkable trees as a "tree row", without specifying the boundaries. A resurvey would be useful to figure out where the tree row starts and ends (1), Official data set describes this tree as a "Platanus acerifolia", resurvey! (1), The official data set describes these remarkable trees as a "tree row", without specifying the boundaries. A resurvey would be useful to figure out where the tree row starts and ends (37), What exactly is this memorial supposed to be? Extrapolated from nearby tree node (1), What tree taxonomy is this? Data set describes the trees as "Fagus, Tilia, Quercus" (2), Wikipedia has a different species for this tree, which one is correct? (1), connected? (1), exact location? (1),
flag10File:Flag of Europe.svg (1), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Flag_of_Belgium.svg (2), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Flag_of_Germany.svg (1), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg (4), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/Flag_of_Luxembourg.svg (1), https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/37/Flag_of_NATO.svg (1),
flag:name2Europe (1), Luxembourg (1),
flag:type10governmental (1), national (8), signal (1),
flag:wikidata4Q122482 (1), Q133022 (2), Q42537 (1),
floating10no (3), yes (7),
flood_prone4yes (4),
food14yes (14),
foot15949customers (1), designated (2753), destination (8), discouraged (2), no (2336), official (2), permissive (303), permit (4), private (78), unknown (7), use_sidepath (79), yes (10376),
footway2075access_aisle (3), crossing (957), designated (2), sidewalk (1113),
footway:left.smoothness2good (2),
footway:left.surface2paving_stones (2),
footway:left.width21 (2),
footway:left:smoothness1good (1),
footway:left:surface1asphalt (1),
footway:left:width11 (1),
footway:right.smoothness1good (1),
footway:right.surface1paving_stones (1),
footway:right.width11 (1),
footway:surface46asphalt (32), concrete (1), concrete:plates (3), paving_stones (10),
ford865seasonal (1), stepping_stones (43), yes (821),
forestry1yes (1),
form1Biesdorf, St. Josef (1),
format76irregular (1), obelisk (29), squared_stone (46),
format:top74flat (3), pyramidal (29), rounded (42),
fortification_type5hill_fort (5),
fountain3jet_water (1), source (1), splash_pad (1),
free_flying:paragliding1yes (1),
free_flying:site1takeoff (1),
frequency20420 (289), 16.7 (110), 234 kHz (3), 50 (1639), irregular (1),
from846Aach, Gemeindeplatz (1), Aachen (1), Aal Gare (1), Ahn, Alphonse Steinès (2), Alzingen, Hondsbréck (1), American Cemetery and memorial (1), Amsterdam Sloterdijk (3), Andernach (1), Antwerpen, Konigin Astridplein (4), Apach (4), Arlom, Gare - Quai 5 (2), Arlon (1), Arlon Athénée (2), Arlon Clinique (2), Arlon Gare - Quai 3 (4), Arlon Gare - Quai 4 (1), Arlon Gare - Quai 6 (4), Arlon TEC - Rue des Genêts (7), Arlon, Square Astrid (1), Arsdorf, Am Duerf (1), Athus (1), Athus Gare (3), Athus Écoles (1), Athus, Gare (3), Audun-le-Tiche (1), Autogara Militari (1), Aéro'Park P&R (1), Bambësch (1), Banzelt, Op der Banzelt (1), Barage de Nisramont (1), Baranzy Cercle au Chêne (1), Barcelona Nord, Estació d'autobusos (1), Bascharage, Bommertbesch (1), Bascharage, Gare (2), Bastogne, Centre Sportif (2), Bastognegare du Sud - Quai 6 (1), Battincourt Centre (1), Bauler (DE) (4), Bavigne, Gemeng (1), Beaufort, Härewiss (2), Beggen, Henri Dunant (1), Belvaux, Lycée Bel-Val (3), Berchem, Gare (1), Bertrange, Belle Etoile (1), Bertrange, Belle Étoile (1), Bertrange, Ecole Européenne II (2), Bertrange, Gemeng (2), Bertrange, Waassertuerm (1), Bettembourg (1), Bettembourg, Gare (11), Biesdorf, St. Josef (1), Biewer Streckenwechsel 3141/3140 (1), Bigelbach, Kiirch (1), Bigonville, Knupp (1), Bilsdorf, Riesenhafferwee (1), Bitburg, ZOB (3), Bodange (1), Bollendorf, Schule (1), Bonnevoie, Baden-Powell (1), Bonnevoie, Demy Schlechter (2), Bonnevoie, Lycée Technique de Bonnevoie (2), Bous, Kapell (1), Bratislava, ZOB (2), Bruxelles-Midi (1), Bussang Source de la Moselle (1), Café du Stadion (1), Camping/Déierepark (1), Canach, Huehlgaass (2), Canach, Weber (2), Canach, Z.A. Réckschleed (2), Canterbury, Canterbury Cathedral (1), Centre, Badanstalt (2), Centre, Monterey (1), Cents, Waassertuerm (3), Cessange, Boy Konen (2), Christnach, Schoulstrooss (1), Clausen, Clausener Bréck (1), Clemency, Schock (2), Clervaux, Gare (7), Colmar, Usines (1), Colmar-Berg, Z.I. Rond-Point (1), Consthum, Knupp (1), Contern, Birewee (1), Contern, Kiircheplaz (2), Contern, Läiteschbaach (1), Crautem, Am Gruef (2), Cruchten (1), Diekirch (2), Diekirch, Gare (5), Diekirch, op der Kluuster (2), Differdange, Arbed (3), Differdange, Ecoles Centre (2), Differt Institut (1), Dommeldange, Gare (2), Dommeldange, LAM (1), Dommeldange, Parc de l'Europe (2), Dorscheid, Am Poul (1), Dudelange, An der Soibelkaul (2), Dudelange, Biereng (1), Dudelange, CFL Multimodal (1), Dudelange, Gare (1), Dudelange, Gemeng (3), Dudelange, Greisendall (1), Dudelange, Skatepark P&R (1), Düsseldorf Hbf (1), Echternach, Gare Centre (11), Echternach, Ste. Croix (1), Echternacherbrück, Fölkenbach (1), Echternacherbrück, Kelterdell (2), Ehnen, Bromel (1), Ehnen, Puddel (1), Eich, Centre Culturel (2), Eischen, Denn (1), Eisenborn, Am Duerf (1), Elvange, Bei Tubes (1), Ernster, Duerfplaz (1), Erpeldange, Kraizgaass (1), Ersange, Irseng (1), Esch, Avenue du Rock’n’Roll (2), Esch, Gare (12), Esch, Place Pierre Ponath (1), Esch-sur-Alzette (1), Esch-sur-Sûre, An de Gäert (3), Eschdorf, An der Driicht (1), Essen, Hbf. (2), Ethe Église (1), Ettelbruck, Gare (22), Findel, Aéroport (2), Fond-de-Gras (1), Freckeisen (1), Frisange, P&R (1), Gare Centrale (1), Gare Pfaffenthal Kirchberg (4), Gasperich, Guillaume Kroll (1), Gasperich, Stade de Luxembourg (2), Gerolstein, Bahnhof (1), Gilsdorf (1), Gilsdorf, Bei der Schoul (1), Goebelsmuehle, Gare (1), Gostingen, Am Ënnerduerf (1), Greisch, Op der Quaert (1), Grevenmacher, Gare routière (11), Grevenmacher, Gare routière quai 2 (1), Grevenmacher, Schoul (5), Grevenmacher, Stadion (1), Guerlange, Rue Saint-Martin (1), Habay-la-Neuve Saint-Benoît (1), Haller, Schoul (1), Hamm, Ierzkaulen (1), Hamm, Rue de Bitbourg (3), Hayange, Esplanade (1), Heffingen, Centre (1), Heisdorf (LU) (2), Heringer Millen Müllerthal (1), Hesperange, Am Keller (1), Hesperange, Cité Um Schlass (1), Hollerich, P+R Bouillon (3), Hosingen, Eesberwee (2), Hosingen, Parc Housen (4), Hostert, Betzberg (2), Houffalize Dépôt TEC (1), Howald, Bei der Kierch (1), Howald, C.I.P.A. (1), Howald, P+R Luxembourg Sud (2), Howald, Peternelchen (1), Howald, Ronnebësch (7), Huldange, Schmëtt (3), Hussigny, Place de l’Eglise (1), Hëttermillen (1), Igel, Moselstraße (3), Im Mai (2), Irrel, Kindergarten (1), Irrel, Schule (3), Irrel, ZOB (2), Itzig, Am Horra (2), Itzig, Hubertuspad (1), Junglinster, Lënster Lycée (LLJ) (3), Junglinster, Op der Gare (3), Junglinster, P+R (5), Kalborn/Kaalber (1), Kautenbach (1), Kautenbach, Op der Gare (2), Kirchberg, Alphonse Weicker (1), Kirchberg, B.E.I. (3), Kirchberg, Chambre des Métiers (1), Kirchberg, Europe - Gare routière (11), Kirchberg, Europe Gare routière (1), Kirchberg, Kierch (1), Kirchberg, Luxexpo (2), Kirchberg, Luxexpo - Gare routière (14), Kirchberg, Luxexpo Entrée Sud (2), Kirchberg, Poutty Stein (1), Kirchberg, Rehazenter (4), Kirchberg, Réimerwee (1), Kleinbettingen, Gare (3), Koblenz (1), Koblenz Hbf (2), Kockelscheuer, Patinoire (2), Konz, Mitte (1), Kornelimünster (1), Kuborn (1), LUX (Kirchberg), Gare rout. Luxexpo (1), Lamadelaine, Op Gehren (1), Larochette (1), Larochette, Bleech (1), Leithum, Bei der Kirich (1), Leudelange, Gemeng (1), Leudelange, LaLux (4), Lieler, Gässelchen (1), Liers (1), Limpertsberg, L.T. du Centre (2), Limpertsberg, LTAM Q2 (1), Limpertsberg, Lycee Technique du Centre (8), Limpertsberg, Lycée Michel Lucius (3), Limpertsberg, Neumans Park (1), Limpertsberg, Theater (2), Lintgen oder Lorentzweiler (1), Livange, Am Duerf (1), Liège Opéra (1), Longlier, Gare (1), Longuyon (4), Lorentzweiler, Gare (1), Losheim, Globus Baumarkt (1), Luxembourg (18), Luxembourg Gare (1), Luxembourg Gare, Rocade quai 3 (1), Luxembourg Gare, Rue Heine (1), Luxembourg P+R Bouillon (6), Luxembourg, Centre Hospitalier (2), Luxembourg, F.D Roosevelt (1), Luxembourg, Gare Centrale (12), Luxembourg, Gare Rocade (9), Luxembourg, Gare Routière (1), Luxembourg, Geesseknäppchen (S) (2), Luxembourg, Grevenmacher (1), Luxembourg, Hamilius (6), Luxembourg, LTC (1), Luxembourg, Monterey (9), Luxembourg, Place de la Constitution (1), Luxembourg, Roosevelt (8), Luxembourg, Stäreplaz / Étoile (10), Luxemburg, P+R Bouillon (1), Luxemburg, P+R Boullion (1), Luxexpo (1), Machtum, Ongkaf (3), Marnach, Geschäftszenter (3), Marseille-Saint-Charles (1), Martelange Dépôt TEC (8), Martelange Dépôt TEC N4 (1), Martelange, Dépôt TEC (2), Martelange, Gare (2), Medingen, Aire de Virage (2), Merl, Athénée (1), Merl, Celtes (2), Merl, Geesseknäppchen (S) (12), Merl, Gesseeknäppchen (S) (1), Mersch (1), Mersch, Gare (15), Mersch, Lycée Ermesinde (2), Merscheid (1), Mertzig, Internat (1), Merzig, Bahnhof (3), Messancy Maison Communale (1), Messancy, Gare (1), Metz Ville (1), Metzange, P&R Metzange (1), Metzdorf, Kirche (1), Michelau, Gare (1), Michelbouch, Michelbouch (1), Moestroff, Kiirch (1), Mondorf, Ecole Internationale (1), Mondorf, Villette (1), Mondorf-les-Bains, Christophorus (1), Mont-Saint-Martin, Auchan PED (1), Musson École Spéciale (2), Nancy (1), Nennig, Bahnhof (1), Neuerburg (Eifel), Schulzentrum (1), Neufchâteau, Parking Saint-Roch - Quai 2 (2), Neuhaeusgen, Iewescht Naihaischen (3), Neuhaeusgen, Iewescht Neihaischen (1), Niederdonven, Bei der Kapell (1), Niederkorn, Hahneboesch (1), Niederkorn, Maartplaz (1), Niederstedem (DE) (1), Niederwampach, A Beetel (1), Nittel, Bahnhof (1), Nittel, Rochusstraße (1), Noertzange (1), Noertzange, Gare (1), Nonnemillen (1), Oberanven, Gemeng (1), Oberbillig, Moselstraße (1), Obercorn, Aquasud (2), Obereisenbach, Bei der Baach (1), Oberkorn, Aquasud (2), Oberpallen, Bréck (1), Oberpallen, Schnuddelbierg (1), Oberwampach, Belzen (1), Ottange, Place de Montcontour (1), Parc Gerlache (2), Paris-Est (3), Parking Glacis (2), Partenza (1), Perl (3), Perl DE/LU (1), Perl, Schengen Lyzeum (4), Petange (2), Piennes, Zone d'activités (1), Pontpierre, Paschtoueschhaus (1), Pratz, Zentrum (1), Pulvermühle (1), Pétange, Gare (1), Ralingen, Kirche (2), Rambrouch, Gare (1), Redange, Atert Lycée (6), Redange, Gare (1), Remerschen, Al Schoul (1), Remich, Gare routière (8), Remich, Place Nico Klopp (3), Remich, Rue de la Corniche (1), Reuland (1), Reuland Bahnhof (1), Rodange (1), Rodange Gare (1), Rodange Usines (3), Rodange, Gare (5), Rodange, Rue Joseph Moscardo (2), Rodange, Schwemm (1), Rombach-Martelange (1), Rombach-Martelange LU/BE (1), Roodt/Syre, Rothoicht (1), Rumelange (1), Rédange, Mairie (1), Saarbrücken Hauptbahnhof (1), Saarburg, Bahnhof-Brückenstraße (1), Saarburg, Schulzentrum (1), Saarlouis, Kleiner Markt (1), Saint Charles, Eglise (1), Saint-Léger Rue du 5 Septembre (1), Saint-Mard Gare (1), Sandweiler, Am Eck (2), Sandweiler, Gare (2), Sankt Vith, Triangel (1), Sankt-Vith An den Linden (1), Sankt-Vith Bischöfliche Schule (1), Saulnes, Place (1), Schifflange, Stadhaus (1), Schmiede Knauf (1), Schrassig, Schlassgewan (1), Schwebsingen, Centre (1), Schweich, P+R (1), Senningerberg, Cargo Center (1), Senningerberg, Charlys Statioun (1), Septfontaines, Schoul (2), Stadtbredimus, Vinsmoselle (1), Stegen (1), Stegen, Eglise (1), Steinfort, Um Quai (4), Steinsel, Kennedy (1), Steinsel, Michel Rodange Plaz (2), Sterpenich IKEA (1), Sterpenich, IKEA (1), Stockem IMP (1), Strassen, Oricher-Hoehl (1), Strassen, Primeurs (1), Temmels, Saarburger Straße (1), Thionville (2), Thionville, Foch Kiosque (3), Toddlermillen (1), Traimont, Route de Volaiville (1), Trier Hbf (2), Trier, Hauptbahnhof (2), Trier, Theodor-Heuss-Allee (2), Trierweiler, Schulstraße (3), Troine-Route, Op der Strooss (1), Troisvierges (1), Troisvierges, Gare (8), Träg, Ort (1), Tuntange, Duerf (3), Vianden (1), Vianden, Gare (4), Vianden, Scheierhaff 1 (1), Villerupt, Barbusse (Église) (1), Volmerange-les-Mines (1), Volmerange-les-Mines, Gare (1), Vukovar, Busbahnhof (1), Wallendorf, Genovevastraße (1), Warken, rue Bourschterbach (1), Wasserbillig (2), Wasserbillig, Celtes (1), Wasserbillig, Gare (1), Wasserbillig, Mesenich frontière (1), Wasserliesch, Grundschule (1), Wecker, Gare (1), Weiswampach (2), Welfrange, Op der Plaz (1), Wiltz (2), Wiltz, Gare (4), Wiltz, Lycée du Nord (12), Wilwerwiltz, Gare (2), Wincheringen, Bahnhof (2), Wincrange, Centre Médical (2), Wittlich Hbf (1), Wormeldange/Haut, Hiehl (2), Zürich HB, Carpark Sihlquai (2), Émerange, Centre Culturel (2),
ft_link1www.freietonne.de?edit=15972 (1),
fuel5charcoal (2), no (1), wood (1), wood/charcoal (1),
fuel:100LL1yes (1),
fuel:GTL_diesel23no (1), yes (22),
fuel:HGV_diesel12no (2), yes (10),
fuel:JetA11yes (1),
fuel:adblue8yes (8),
fuel:autogas1yes (1),
fuel:b71yes (1),
fuel:biodiesel1no (1),
fuel:biogas1yes (1),
fuel:cng2yes (2),
fuel:diesel93no (1), yes (92),
fuel:diesel_extra1yes (1),
fuel:diesel_plus1yes (1),
fuel:e108no (1), yes (7),
fuel:e51yes (1),
fuel:electricity1yes (1),
fuel:eurosuper_95_e101yes (1),
fuel:lpg16no (5), yes (11),
fuel:octane_1003yes (3),
fuel:octane_1021yes (1),
fuel:octane_917no (1), yes (6),
fuel:octane_9584no (1), yes (83),
fuel:octane_9888no (1), yes (87),
fuel:others1no (1),
fuel:shell_diesel_extra1yes (1),
fuel:v-power1yes (1),
fuel:v-power_diesel1yes (1),
funicular10yes (10),
furniture3bed (2), cupboard (1),
future:landuse1x (1),
other | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z |